Original Research Focus on Suicide August 31, 2021

Effectiveness of an Internet-Based Self-help Therapy Program for Suicidal Ideation With Follow-up at 6 Months: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Charlotte Mühlmann, PhD; Trine Madsen, PhD; Carsten Hjorthøj, PhD; Julie L. Forman, PhD; Ad J. F. M. Kerkhof, PhD; Merete Nordentoft, DMSc; Annette Erlangsen, PhD

J Clin Psychiatry 2021;82(5):20m13803

ABSTRACT

Objective: The majority of individuals with suicidal ideation do not receive help, and every year close to 800,000 people die by suicide. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a guided internet-based self-help program compared to a waiting list control group in reducing suicidal ideation.

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 402 individuals with suicidal ideation were assigned to a guided internet-based self-help program or a waiting list control group from September 13, 2016, to September 2, 2018. The primary outcome was suicidal ideation measured with the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation at postintervention (6 weeks after baseline).

Results: Participants assigned to the internet-based self-help program experienced at postintervention a significant reduction on the primary outcome of suicidal ideation (mean difference: 2.91; 95% CI, 1.28 to 4.54; P = .0005, Cohen’s d = 0.25) compared to the waiting list control group and on the secondary outcomes of hopelessness (mean difference: 1.98; 95% CI, 0.97 to 3.99) and worrying (mean difference: 5.19; 95% CI, 2.36 to 8.10). Six months later (follow-up), the difference between the groups remained significant for suicidal ideation, hopelessness, and worrying. A total of 28 (16.8%) of the participants in the intervention group reported negative effects from the internet-based self-help program.

Conclusions: Internet-based self-help therapy was associated with a reduction in suicidal ideation at postintervention and 6-month follow-up. Some participants found it challenging to work with the therapeutic exercises, and we recommend that internet-based self-help therapy be implemented in mental health clinics or crisis lines, where support or online counseling is available.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02872610

Continue Reading...

Did you know members enjoy unlimited free PDF downloads as part of their subscription? Subscribe today for instant access to this article and our entire library in your preferred format. Alternatively, you can purchase the PDF of this article individually.

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Login

Purchase PDF for $40

Members enjoy free PDF downloads on all articles. Join today

  1. Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, et al. Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and attempts. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;192(2):98–105. PubMed CrossRef
  2. Tarrier N, Taylor K, Gooding P. Cognitive-behavioral interventions to reduce suicide behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Modif. 2008;32(1):77–108. PubMed CrossRef
  3. O’Connor RC, Nock MK. The psychology of suicidal behaviour. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014;1(1):73–85. PubMed CrossRef
  4. Hom MA, Stanley IH, Joiner TE Jr. Evaluating factors and interventions that influence help-seeking and mental health service utilization among suicidal individuals: a review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;40:28–39. PubMed CrossRef
  5. Bruffaerts R, Demyttenaere K, Hwang I, et al. Treatment of suicidal people around the world. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(1):64–70. PubMed CrossRef
  6. van Spijker BAJ, Majo MC, Smit F, et al. Reducing suicidal ideation: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial of unguided web-based self-help. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e141. PubMed CrossRef
  7. van Spijker BAJ, van Straten A, Kerkhof AJFM. The effectiveness of a web-based self-help intervention to reduce suicidal thoughts: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2010;11(1):25. PubMed CrossRef
  8. van Spijker BAJ, Calear AL, Batterham PJ, et al. Reducing suicidal thoughts in the Australian general population through web-based self-help: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):62. PubMed CrossRef
  9. Torok M, Han J, Baker S, et al. Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(1):e25–e36. PubMed CrossRef
  10. Büscher R, Torok M, Terhorst Y, et al. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e203933. PubMed CrossRef
  11. van Spijker BAJ, van Straten A, Kerkhof AJFM. Effectiveness of online self-help for suicidal thoughts: results of a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e90118. PubMed CrossRef
  12. van Spijker BA, Werner-Seidler A, Batterham PJ, et al. Effectiveness of a web-based self-help program for suicidal thinking in an Australian community sample: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(2):e15. PubMed CrossRef
  13. De Jaegere E, van Landschoot R, van Heeringen K, et al. The online treatment of suicidal ideation: a randomised controlled trial of an unguided web-based intervention. Behav Res Ther. 2019;119:103406. PubMed CrossRef
  14. Richards D, Richardson T. Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32(4):329–342. PubMed CrossRef
  15. Karyotaki E, Efthimiou O, Miguel C, et al; Individual Patient Data Meta-Analyses for Depression (IPDMA-DE) Collaboration. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a systematic review and individual patient data network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(4):361–371. PubMed CrossRef
  16. Mühlmann C, Madsen T, Hjorthøj C, et al. The Self-help Online against Suicidal thoughts (SOS) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):45. PubMed CrossRef
  17. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ranieri WF. Scale for Suicide Ideation: psychometric properties of a self-report version. J Clin Psychol. 1988;44(4):499–505. PubMed CrossRef
  18. Brown GK. A Review of Suicide Assessment Measures for Intervention Research with Adults and Older Adults. National Institute of Mental Health; 2001.
  19. O’Sullivan RL, Fava M, Agustin C, et al. Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997;95(5):379–384. PubMed CrossRef
  20. Velting DM. Personality and negative expectancies: trait structure of the Beck Hopelessness Scale. Pers Individ Dif. 1999;26(5):913–921. CrossRef
  21. Stöber J, Bittencourt J. Weekly assessment of worry: an adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for monitoring changes during treatment. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36(6):645–656. PubMed CrossRef
  22. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, et al. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–176. PubMed CrossRef
  23. van Spijker BAJ, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, et al. The Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS): community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014;44(4):408–419. PubMed CrossRef
  24. Bouwmans C, De Jong K, Timman R, et al. Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):217. PubMed CrossRef
  25. Olsen LR, Jensen DV, Noerholm V, et al. The internal and external validity of the Major Depression Inventory in measuring severity of depressive states. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):351–356. PubMed CrossRef
  26. Ritterband LM, Ardalan K, Thorndike FP, et al. Real world use of an Internet intervention for pediatric encopresis. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(2):e16. PubMed CrossRef
  27. Rozental A, Andersson G, Boettcher J, et al. Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions. Internet Interv. 2014;1(1):12–19. CrossRef