Original Research June 15, 2012

A Multicenter, Add-On Randomized Controlled Trial of Low-Dose d-Serine for Negative and Cognitive Symptoms of Schizophrenia

Mark Weiser, MD; Uriel Heresco-Levy, MD; Michael Davidson, MD; Daniel C. Javitt, MD, PhD; Nomi Werbeloff, PhD; Ari A. Gershon, MD; Yehuda Abramovich, MD; Daniela Amital, MD; Adiel Doron, MD; Shai Konas, MD; Yehiel Levkovitz, MD; David Liba, MD; Alexander Teitelbaum, MD; Mordechai Mashiach, MD; Yosef Zimmerman, MD

J Clin Psychiatry 2012;73(6):e728-e734

Article Abstract

Background: Observations that antagonists of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor of glutamatergic neurons can mimic symptoms of schizophrenia have raised the hope that NMDA agonists can improve symptoms. On the basis of encouraging results of trials in which NMDA agonists were added to antipsychotics, we conducted an adequately powered randomized controlled trial adding D-serine, an NMDA modulator, to antipsychotics.

Method: This study was a 195-patient, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 16-week trial of d-serine 2 g/d as an add-on treatment to antipsychotics. Subjects had DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and were inpatients or outpatients stabilized on antipsychotics, with persistent negative symptoms. The primary outcome measures were changes in negative symptoms and cognition as measured by the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) battery, respectively. The study was performed between 2003 and 2007.

Results: Mean total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores at baseline were 75.5. Subjects receiving d-serine and placebo improved in scores on the SANS and MATRICS, but no significant differences were observed between groups: improvement on SANS was 11.4% for d-serine vs 14.8% for placebo, F1,147=1.18, P=.32; and improvement on MATRICS was 6.8% for d-serine vs 6.1% for placebo, F1,125=0.96, P=.39, respectively. D-Serine was well tolerated.

Discussion:This study did not find a significant difference between drug and placebo. However, the results are limited by a relatively large placebo response and somewhat lower-achieved doses than in prior studies. Future studies will administer higher doses and will attempt to affect the NMDA receptor using other mechanisms, such as agonists of the presynaptic metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor or glycine reuptake inhibitors.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00138775

J Clinical Psychiatry 2012; 73(6): 728-734

© 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.’ ‹’ ‹

Continue Reading...

Did you know members enjoy unlimited free PDF downloads as part of their subscription? Subscribe today for instant access to this article and our entire library in your preferred format. Alternatively, you can purchase the PDF of this article individually.

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Login

Purchase PDF for $40.00

Members enjoy free PDF downloads on all articles. Join today