Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Tool (PSAT): Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation

Hamideh Bayrampour, MSc, PhD; Richard E. Hohn, PhD(c); Sukhpreet K. Tamana, PhD; Richard Sawatzky, PhD; Patricia A. Janssen, RN, PhD; Jeffrey N. Bone, PhD(c); Nichole Fairbrother, PhD; K. S. Joseph, MD, PhD

J Clin Psychiatry 2023;84(3):22m14696

ABSTRACT

Objective: Pregnancy-specific anxiety (PSA) is a distinct construct from general anxiety and depression. The purpose of this study was to develop, evaluate, and validate the Pregnancy-Specific Anxiety Tool (PSAT), to measure PSA and its severity.

Methods: The study was carried out in 2 stages. Stage 1 involved item development and content and face validation. Stage 2 included psychometric evaluation to examine item distributions and correlational structure, dimensionality, internal consistency reliability, stability, and construct, convergent, and criterion validity, using 2 independent samples (initial sample N = 494, May–October 2018; validation sample N = 325, July 2019–May 2020).

Results: Eighty-two items were evaluated for face validity and 41 items were considered in stage 2 based on feedback from participants and experts. Model fit from exploratory factor analysis and patterns of item-factor loadings suggested a 6-factor model with 33 items. The 6 factors included items pertaining to health and well-being of the baby, labor and the pregnant person’s well-being, postpartum, support, career and finance, and indicators of severity. Confirmatory factor analysis carried out using the initial sample showed good fit with the validation sample. The area under the curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of adjustment disorders (AD) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67–0.79), and for AD/any anxiety disorders, the AUC was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75–0.85).

Conclusions: The PSAT can be useful for screening and monitoring of PSA, and pregnant people with scores higher than 10 should be considered for further assessment.

Continue Reading...

Did you know members enjoy unlimited free PDF downloads as part of their subscription? Subscribe today for instant access to this article and our entire library in your preferred format. Alternatively, you can purchase the PDF of this article individually.

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Login

Download Free PDF

References (58)

Bayrampour H, Ali E, McNeil DA, et al. Pregnancy-related anxiety: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016. PubMed CrossRef
Huizink AC, Mulder EJH, Robles de Medina PG, et al. Is pregnancy anxiety a distinctive syndrome? Early Hum Dev. 2004;79(2):81–91. PubMed CrossRef
Orr ST, Reiter JP, Blazer DG, et al. Maternal prenatal pregnancy-related anxiety and spontaneous preterm birth in Baltimore, Maryland. Psychosom Med. 2007;69(6):566–570. PubMed CrossRef
Theut SK, Pedersen FA, Zaslow MJ, et al. Pregnancy subsequent to perinatal loss: parental anxiety and depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1988;27(3):289–292. PubMed CrossRef
Ross LE, Gilbert Evans SE, Sellers EM, et al. Measurement issues in postpartum depression part 1: anxiety as a feature of postpartum depression. Arch Women Ment Health. 2003;6(1):51–57. PubMed CrossRef
Blackmore ER, Gustafsson H, Gilchrist M, et al. Pregnancy-related anxiety: evidence of distinct clinical significance from a prospective longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2016;197:251–258. PubMed CrossRef
Stout-Oswald SA, Glynn LM, Bisoffi M, et al. Prenatal exposure to maternal psychological distress and telomere length in childhood. Dev Psychobiol. 2022;64(1):e22238. PubMed CrossRef
Dereix AE, Ledyard R, Redhunt AM, et al. Maternal anxiety and depression in pregnancy and DNA methylation of the NR3C1 glucocorticoid receptor gene. Epigenomics. 2021;13(21):1701–1709. PubMed CrossRef
Blair MM, Glynn LM, Sandman CA, et al. Prenatal maternal anxiety and early childhood temperament. Stress. 2011;14(6):644–651. PubMed CrossRef
Kramer MS, Lydon J, Séguin L, et al. Stress pathways to spontaneous preterm birth: the role of stressors, psychological distress, and stress hormones. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(11):1319–1326. PubMed CrossRef
Lobel M, Cannella DL, Graham JE, et al. Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes. Health Psychol. 2008;27(5):604–615. PubMed CrossRef
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition. American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Matthey S, Ross-Hamid C. The validity of DSM symptoms for depression and anxiety disorders during pregnancy. J Affect Disord. 2011;133(3):546–552. PubMed CrossRef
Roesch SC, Dunkel SC, Woo G, et al. Modeling the types and timing of stress in pregnancy. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2004;17(1):87–102. CrossRef
Levin JS. The factor structure of the Pregnancy Anxiety Scale. J Health Soc Behav. 1991;32(4):368–381. PubMed CrossRef
Cote-Arsenault D. The influence of perinatal loss on anxiety in multigravidas. J Obstet, Gynecol, Neonat Nurs. 2003;32(5):623–629.
Rini CK, Dunkel-Schetter C, Wadhwa PD, et al. Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: the role of personal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy. Health Psychol. 1999;18(4):333–345. PubMed CrossRef
Brunton RJ, Dryer R, Saliba A, et al. Pregnancy anxiety: a systematic review of current scales. J Affect Disord. 2015;176:24–34. PubMed CrossRef
Brunton RJ, Dryer R, Saliba A, et al. The initial development of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale. Women Birth. 2019;32(1):e118–e130. PubMed CrossRef
Harpel TS. Fear of the unknown: ultrasound and anxiety about fetal health. Health (London). 2008;12(3):295–312. PubMed CrossRef
Cox BE. Pregnancy, Anxiety, and Time Perception. University of Illinois; 1987.
Rubin R. Maternal tasks in pregnancy. Matern Child Nurs J. 1975;4(3):143–153. PubMed
Patrick DL, Guyatt GH, Acquardo C. Patient-reported outcomes. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):1889–1905. PubMed CrossRef
McKenna SP. Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science. (Review) BMC Med. 2011;9(1):86. PubMed CrossRef
Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, et al. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. PubMed CrossRef
Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 3rd ed. Wiley Blackwell; 2016.
Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, et al. How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018;2(1):42. PubMed CrossRef
Bayrampour H, McNeil DA, Benzies K, et al. A qualitative inquiry on pregnant women’s preferences for mental health screening. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):339. PubMed CrossRef
Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–386. PubMed CrossRef
DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage Publications; 2012.
Polit DFB. CT Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467. PubMed CrossRef
Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2015.
Ryan K, Gannon-Slater N, Culbertson MJ. Improving survey methods with cognitive interviews in small- and medium-scale evaluations. Am J Eval. 2012;33(3):414–430. CrossRef
Bayrampour H, Tomfohr L, Tough S. Trajectories of perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms in a community cohort. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(11):e1467–e1473. PubMed CrossRef
Buss C, Davis EP, Hobel CJ, et al. Maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety is associated with child executive function at 6–9 years age. Stress. 2011;14(6):665–676. PubMed CrossRef
Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–786. PubMed CrossRef
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–1097. PubMed CrossRef
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
Heaman MI, Gupton AL. Psychometric testing of the Perception of Pregnancy Risk Questionnaire. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32(5):493–503. PubMed CrossRef
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–396. PubMed CrossRef
Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. 4th ed. Springer; 2010.
American Psychiatric Association. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5). 2015. https://wwwappiorg/products/structured-clinical-interview-for-dsm-5-scid-5
Cook KF, Kallen MA, Amtmann D. Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT’s unidimensionality assumption. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(4):447–460. PubMed CrossRef
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. CrossRef
Zumbo BD, Gadermann A, Zeisser C. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2007;6(1):8. CrossRef
RCR Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R Project website. https://www.R-project.org/.
Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):36. CrossRef
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus (Version 8.4) [computer software]. https://www.statmodel.com/.
McNeish D, Wolf MG. Thinking twice about sum scores. Behav Res Methods. 2020;52(6):2287–2305. PubMed CrossRef
Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. CRC Press; 1990.
Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):315–323. PubMed CrossRef
Lojewski J, Flothow A, Harth V, et al. Employed and expecting in Germany: a qualitative investigation into pregnancy-related occupational stress and coping behavior. Work. 2018;59(2):183–199. PubMed CrossRef
Jones KP. To tell or not to tell? examining the role of discrimination in the pregnancy disclosure process at work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(2):239–250. PubMed CrossRef
Hackney KJ, Daniels SR, Paustian-Underdahl SC, et al. Examining the effects of perceived pregnancy discrimination on mother and baby health. J Appl Psychol. 2021;106(5):774–783. PubMed CrossRef
Bayrampour H, Heaman M, Duncan KA, et al. Advanced maternal age and risk perception: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):100. PubMed CrossRef
Bayrampour H, Tamana SK, Boutin A. Pregnant people’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods, descriptive study. CMAJ Open. 2022;10(1):E146–E154. PubMed CrossRef