Original Research May 4, 2010

Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Relationship to Treatment Response and Symptom Relapse

Eric Hollander, MD; Dan J. Stein, MD; Naomi A. Fineberg, MD; Florence Marteau, MSc; Mark Legault, PhD

J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71(6):784-792

Article Abstract

Objective: Data were analyzed from 2 prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of escitalopram in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) to characterize the baseline levels of functional disability and impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to assess the relationship between treatment outcomes (response or relapse) and disability or HRQoL.

Method: Data from a 24-week, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial (N’ ‰=’ ‰466) of escitalopram (10-20 mg/d) or paroxetine (40 mg/d) and from a 40-week, flexible-dose (escitalopram 10-20 mg/d), placebo-controlled relapse-prevention trial (N’ ‰=’ ‰468) were analyzed. Obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms (DSM-IV criteria) were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and HRQoL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36). Baseline data were pooled for patients across both studies. For patients in the fixed-dose study, SDS and SF-36 scores were compared across treatment groups and for responders versus nonresponders. In the relapse-prevention trial, SDS and SF-36 scores were compared for relapsed versus nonrelapsed patients.

Results: Patients with more severe baseline symptoms (YBOCS’ ‰≥’ ‰27) reported significantly greater impairment on the SDS (P’ ‰<‘ ‰.001) and SF-36 (except for bodily pain). Patients receiving escitalopram or paroxetine reported significant improvements on most SF-36 dimensions and on the SDS compared to placebo; however, improvements in work-related functioning were seen earlier for patients receiving escitalopram (20 mg/d). At the study endpoints, SDS and SF-36 scores were significantly better for patients who were responders (versus nonresponders) and for patients who did not relapse (versus relapsers).

Conclusions: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is associated with significant impairment in functioning and HRQoL. Significant differences in disability and HRQoL between responders and nonresponders or relapsers and nonrelapsers suggest a relationship between symptomatic and functional outcomes.

Trial Registration: lundbecktrials.com Identifiers: 10205 and 10193

J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71(6):784-792

Submitted: December 14, 2009; accepted February 11, 2010.

Online ahead of print: May 4, 2010 (doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05911blu).

Corresponding author: Eric Hollander, MD, Montefiore Medical Center University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine Child Psychiatry Annex, 111 E. 210th St, Bronx, NY 10467-2490 ([email protected]).

Continue Reading...

Did you know members enjoy unlimited free PDF downloads as part of their subscription? Subscribe today for instant access to this article and our entire library in your preferred format. Alternatively, you can purchase the PDF of this article individually.

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Login

Purchase PDF for $40.00

Members enjoy free PDF downloads on all articles. Join today