Clinical Summary

Clinical Summary: Solriamfetol for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

Many adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder still have meaningful symptoms or executive dysfunction despite available medications, and some cannot tolerate standard options. This pilot trial tests whether solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor already approved for sleepiness disorders, can provide a clinically useful alternative for adult ADHD.

Design a double-blind pilot study
N 60 adults with ADHD
Population individuals who were at least 18 years old and younger than 65 years old
Duration a duration of 6 weeks

Key Findings

  • By week 6, the mean total improvement in AISRS score was −7.6 for active study drug participants and −2.1 for individuals on placebo (P = .0012; effect size = 1.09); the between-group mean AISRS difference at week 6 was −4.3 (95% CI, −7.7 to −1.0; P = .0106).
  • Clinician-rated benefit separated from placebo by week 3, when the difference in mean AISRS scores was −3.4 (95% CI, −6.7 to −0.1; P = .0439), and remained significant through week 6.
  • Response outcomes favored solriamfetol: total AISRS score improved 25% by week 6 in 52% of individuals on solriamfetol treatment versus 17% of individuals on placebo (P = .0119), and the prespecified responder definition occurred in 45% of participants in the treatment group and 6.9% in the placebo group (P = .0020).
  • Symptom remission and global improvement were more common with solriamfetol: AISRS total score ≤ 18 occurred in 59% of participants on solriamfetol treatment and 21% on placebo (P = .0067), while CGI ratings of much or very much improved occurred in 45%, 13/29, versus 6%, 2/31 (P = .0020).
  • Executive function and self-reported symptoms also improved more with active treatment: 69% versus 34% had a 0.5–standard deviation improvement on the BRIEF-A Global Executive Composite (P = .0173), and MASRS total scores changed by −11.1 (95% CI, −14.6 to −7.7) versus −3.9 (95% CI, −7.4 to −0.5; P = .0047; effect size = 1.23).
Clinical Bottom Line

Solriamfetol 75 mg to 150 mg produced clinically meaningful improvement in adult ADHD symptoms, global status, and executive function over 6 weeks, with no significant excess cardiovascular signal versus placebo in this pilot trial. For adults who have not done well with standard ADHD treatments, solriamfetol is a credible off-label option that warrants serious consideration while larger confirmatory studies are awaited.

Practice Implications

  • Consider solriamfetol for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder who have inadequate benefit, partial benefit, or poor tolerability with approved ADHD medications, especially when inattention and executive dysfunction are prominent.
  • Monitor blood pressure and heart rate during treatment, but note that in this 6-week trial there were no significant between-group differences in change in heart rate (+3.7 versus +2.2 bpm; P = .5609), systolic blood pressure (+2.4 versus +1.5 mm Hg; P = .6474), or diastolic blood pressure (+1.1 versus +1.5 mm Hg; P = .8117).
  • Discuss appetite reduction, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, insomnia, increased energy, cardiovascular symptoms, and neurologic symptoms as expected tolerability issues; adverse events led to dose adjustment or interruption in 10 subjects on active treatment and 4 on placebo.
  • Do not assume ADHD improvement is simply a wakefulness effect: ESS scores improved by −2.4 points (P = .0056), but AISRS improvement was not moderated by changes in ESS ratings of sleepiness (P = .3735), and PSQI outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.