Key Takeaways

  1. In this community sample, full-interview speech models performed substantially better than patient-only verified segments for major depressive disorder, with best F1-scores of 77.48% (±5.59) versus 45.05% (±24.84), suggesting that longer conversational samples may be important if speech screening is implemented in prenatal care.
  2. For generalized anxiety disorder, full-interview models also outperformed verified-segment and wav2vec2 approaches, achieving a best F1-score of 79.57% (±14.81) compared with 64.89% (±16.68) and 51.62% (±14.09), respectively; simpler acoustic feature engineering outperformed the pretrained deep model in this dataset.
  3. Models based only on pregnancy and sociodemographic variables had limited discrimination for both major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder, with best F1-scores of 39.33% (±5.36) and 33.04% (±15.50), indicating that standard risk factors alone may miss clinically diagnosed cases captured by speech patterns.
  4. Adding pregnancy and sociodemographic characteristics to the best speech pipelines did not improve classification: generalized anxiety disorder remained at 79.57%±14.81, major depressive disorder declined to 75.00%±17.09, and unpaired t tests showed no statistical difference versus speech-only models for major depressive disorder (P value=∼.82) or generalized anxiety disorder (P value=1.0).
  5. The strongest candidate markers differed somewhat by diagnosis: pause duration, F0, and shimmer were most influential for major depressive disorder, whereas harmonics-to-noise ratio, jitter, and F0 were most influential for generalized anxiety disorder, which may help clinicians interpret why monotony, pausing, and voice-quality changes could carry diagnostic signal.
  6. These findings come from a small but diagnostically rigorous sample of 146 participants, including 19 with major depressive disorder and 28 with generalized anxiety disorder, with outcomes established by SCID-5 rather than symptom scales; however, 72% of participants identified their ethnic background as White, which limits generalizability across more diverse pregnant populations.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.