Original Research Focus on Psychosis November 30, 2022

Telehealth of Coordinated Specialty Care in Early Psychosis During COVID-19

Elisa B. Nelson, PhD; Olivia H. Franco, BS; Bridgette A. Patton, BA; Lyndsay R. Schmidt, MA, ML; H. Steven Lawley, MA, LPC; Monica E. Calkins, PhD; Christian G. Kohler, MD

J Clin Psychiatry 2023;84(1):21m14259

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced health care globally to provide remote services when feasible. In March 2020, psychiatric outpatient services across the United States transitioned to telehealth. Persons with early psychosis (EP) face challenges to maintain connection with care, an important element associated with better outcome. The ongoing pandemic offers the opportunity to review the feasibility of EP services using telehealth and to evaluate implications for continued implementation.

Methods: We examined delivery of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for 49 individuals aged 16–30 years enrolled in an EP (first-episode psychosis and clinical high risk) university-affiliated outpatient clinic located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from March 2020 to July 2021, during which most appointments were delivered through telehealth. The services evaluated in this setting include psychotherapy, medication management, employment and educational services, peer support, and multifamily psychoeducation group. We compared completed and missed appointment rates across services and new enrollment rates with in-person versus hybrid telehealth and in-person care pre–COVID-19 and during the pandemic.

Results: In 6 months pre–COVID-19 (September 2019–February 2020), the Psychosis Evaluation and Recovery Center enrolled a mean of 4 people/mo compared to during the pandemic (March 2020–July 2021), when a mean of 2.2 people/mo were enrolled. The total number of completed psychology appointments pre–COVID-19 ranged from 51 to 88 and during the pandemic ranged from 72 to 137. The rate of missed psychology appointments ranged from 1.4% to 6.4% pre–COVID-19 and from 3.4% to 11.3% during the pandemic. The total number of completed medication management appointments pre–COVID-19 ranged from 35 to 59 and during the pandemic ranged from 22 to 66. The rate of missed medication management appointments ranged from 2.1% to 8.0% pre–COVID-19 and from 1.7% to 9.1% during the pandemic. The total number of completed supported education and employment services appointments pre–COVID-19 ranged from 5 to 11 and during the pandemic ranged from 3 to 16. Finally, the mean number of family members in attendance at the family psychoeducation group was 8.3 pre–COVID-19 and 17.1 during the pandemic.

Conclusions: New and continued engagement across services in EP CSC during the COVID-19 pandemic supports feasibility of telehealth and suggests that offering a hybrid model of in-person and telehealth should be considered once restrictions are lifted.

Continue Reading...

Did you know members enjoy unlimited free PDF downloads as part of their subscription? Subscribe today for instant access to this article and our entire library in your preferred format. Alternatively, you can purchase the PDF of this article individually.

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Login

Purchase PDF for $40

Members enjoy free PDF downloads on all articles. Join today

  1. Backhaus A, Agha Z, Maglione ML, et al. Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review. Psychol Serv. 2012;9(2):111–131. PubMed CrossRef
  2. Sharp IR, Kobak KA, Osman DA. The use of videoconferencing with patients with psychosis: a review of the literature. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2011;10(1):10–14. PubMed CrossRef
  3. Shore JH, Schneck CD, Mishkind MC. Telepsychiatry and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic—current and future outcomes of the rapid virtualization of psychiatric care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(12):1211–1212. PubMed CrossRef
  4. Wright JH, Caudill R. Remote treatment delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(3):130–132. PubMed CrossRef
  5. Chaudhry S, Weiss A, Dillon G, et al. Psychosis, telehealth, and COVID-19: successes and lessons learned from the first wave of the pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;6:1–4. CrossRef
  6. Santesteban-Echarri O, Piskulic D, Nyman RK, et al. Telehealth interventions for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and clinical high-risk for psychosis individuals: a scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(1–2):14–20. PubMed CrossRef
  7. Perkins DO, Gu H, Boteva K, et al. Relationship between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in first-episode schizophrenia: a critical review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(10):1785–1804. PubMed CrossRef
  8. Hoffman L, Wisniewski H, Hays R, et al. Digital Opportunities for Outcomes in Recovery Services (DOORS): a pragmatic hands-on group approach toward increasing digital health and smartphone competencies, autonomy, relatedness, and alliance for those with serious mental illness. J Psychiatr Pract. 2020;26(2):80–88. PubMed CrossRef
  9. Lal S, Abdel-Baki A, Sujanani S, et al. Perspectives of young adults on receiving telepsychiatry services in an urban early intervention program for first-episode psychosis: a cross-sectional, descriptive survey study. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:117. PubMed CrossRef
  10. Alston M, Bennett CF, Rochani H. Treatment adherence in youth with first-episode psychosis: impact of family support and telehealth delivery. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019;40(11):951–956. PubMed CrossRef
  11. Lucksted A, Essock SM, Stevenson J, et al. Client views of engagement in the RAISE connection program for early psychosis recovery. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66(7):699–704. PubMed CrossRef
  12. Tse J, LaStella D, Chow E, et al. Telehealth acceptability and feasibility among people served in a community behavioral health system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatr Serv. 2021;72(6):654–660. PubMed CrossRef
  13. Lynch DA, Medalia A, Saperstein A. The design, implementation, and acceptability of telehealth comprehensive recovery service for people with complex psychosis living in NYC during the COVID-19 Crisis. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:581149. PubMed CrossRef
  14. Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261–276. PubMed CrossRef
  15. Coronavirus Disease. (COVID-2019)—Guidance. City of Philadelphia website. https://www.phila.gov/programs/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/guidance/guidance-documents/. 2019. Accessed January 21, 2021
  16. Moreno C, Wykes T, Galderisi S, et al. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(9):813–824. PubMed CrossRef
  17. Eberly LA, Kallan MJ, Julien HM, et al. Patient characteristics associated with telemedicine access for primary and specialty ambulatory care during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2031640. PubMed CrossRef