Original Research December 22, 2022

Association Between Different Attachment Styles and Trends of Engagement in Violent Video Games: A Study Among Lebanese Male Adolescents

Marwan Akel, PhD; Jana Berro, BS; Diana Malaeb, PhD; Iqbal Fahs, PharmD; Chadia Haddad, PhD; Souheil Hallit, PharmD, MSc, MPH, PhD; Sahar Obeid, PhD

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2022;24(6):21m03167

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the association of different attachment styles with the exposure of Lebanese male adolescents to violent video games.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey study was conducted between October and December 2019 among 388 Lebanese male adolescents (aged 13–17 years) from 5 Lebanese schools. Participants answered questions regarding the 4 attachment styles (secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing) and violent video game engagement.

Results: Dismissing attachment style (β = −1.389) was significantly associated with less violent video gaming. Higher fearful attachment style (β = 2.981) was significantly associated with more violent video gaming.

Conclusions: Adolescents with more insecure attachment styles were found to be more engaged in violent video games. Further research is needed on stress and empathy in association with these attachment styles to investigate whether they have an impact on violent gaming exposure. Future studies should focus on the type of video games and whether they require interaction with others.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2022;24(6):21m03167

To cite: Akel M, Berro J, Malaeb D, et al. Association between different attachment styles and trends of engagement in violent video games: a study among Lebanese male adolescents. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2022;24(6):21m03167.
To share: https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.21m03167

© 2022 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

aSchool of Pharmacy, Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon
bINSPECT-LB: Institut National de Santé Publique, Épidémiologie Clinique et Toxicologie, Beirut, Lebanon
cFaculty of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon
dCollege of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
eResearch Department, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, Jal Eddib, Lebanon
fSchool of Health Sciences, Modern University of Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon
gSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon
hApplied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
iSocial and Education Sciences Department, School of Arts and Sciences, Lebanese American University, Jbeil, Lebanon
‡Dr Akel and Ms Berro are first co-authors. Drs Hallit and Obeid are last co-authors.
*Corresponding authors: Souheil Hallit, PharmD, MSc, MPH, PhD, School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, PO Box 446, Jounieh, Lebanon ([email protected]); Chadia Haddad, PhD, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross, PO Box 60096, Jall-Eddib, Lebanon ([email protected]).

 

 

Video games, known as electronic interactive leisure activities, are mainly categorized into educational, entertainment, and violent games.1,2 Violent video games are defined as those that depict intentional attempts by individuals who can be nonhuman, cartoon characters, real people, or anything in between to perpetrate harm on others.3 Studies4,5 have shown that more than 90% of American youth play video games, and more than 90% of those games contain depictions of violence. Due to increased exposure and popularity, videogaming is now considered one of the largest multimedia activities in the world.6 Extensive research has examined the consequences of violent video gaming. It has been documented that exposure to violent video gaming triggers the development and manifestation of aggression associated with anger and impulsivity.7–9 Some reviews of research on violent video games assert that widespread exposure of young people to violent games could have major societal consequences induced through aggressive thoughts and behaviors.10 Other studies11–14 have suggested that prolonged exposure to video gaming in general may have a detrimental impact on attention and ability to focus among users, with the possibility to evolve to a clinically relevant attentional deficit with worsened scholastic performance, defective memory function, and lower intelligence. In addition, playing violent video games may stimulate physiologic arousal and hostility, decrease the empathy manifested through helping others, and cause a desensitizing physiologic effect.15,16

Given the various detrimental consequences of violent video gaming, there are certain factors such as parental monitoring and secure attachment relationship with the parent at infancy that might be protective against exposure to violent video gaming.17 Attachment styles have been conceptualized in different ways over the years. Bartholomew and Horowitz18 defined 4 different attachment styles regarding the object of mental models (self or other) and the predominant feeling about that object (positive or negative).  The 4 prototypical attachment styles derived from this model are secure, preoccupied, dismissing, and fearful. The latter 3 are recognized as insecure attachment styles.

Securely attached individuals feel they are worthy of love and are confident to ask for support or to support others.19 Preoccupied individuals are more stressed and exhibit low self-esteem and hence approach their relationships while seeking approval from others.20 Dismissive individuals tend to suppress their emotions and rely on themselves while prioritizing achievements over relationships. Lastly, fearful individuals view themselves as unworthy of support and exhibit high levels of distrust toward others.21

Establishment of secure attachment with a primary caregiver has direct implications for negotiating new tasks, actively exploring the environment, and dealing with issues of self-regulation, thus minimizing exposure to violent video gaming.22 Research has found significant associations among different attachment styles and problematic use of the internet including video games.23–25 However, scant literature has focused on the association between violent video games and different attachment styles. One study26 found that individuals with avoidance attachment styles engaged less in video games with family, friends, and strangers on the internet and preferred playing alone, especially compared with individuals scoring high on a secure attachment style. Attachment styles have a strong influential effect on social interactions and emotional development, which determine the risk of dependence progression, problematic use of technology, and excessive exposure to video gaming and most likely those games that are violent.23,27,28

Although the effect of violent video games on players’ aggression levels has been examined, 2 opposing views remain. Some studies correlated violent video games with increased aggression,29 whereas others found minimal or no difference following exposure to these types of games.30 However, widespread public concern regarding violent games reducing empathy in those who engage with them calls for further research on the topic, especially in regard to examining the factors associated with dependence on violent video gaming. Male adolescents have been shown to be the category of individuals most invested in violent video games.31 Moreover, in Lebanon, there are no data regarding violent video gaming and its impact on attachment styles, particularly among children and adolescents. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the association between violent video gaming exposure and attachment styles among Lebanese male adolescents.

METHODS

Study Design and Procedure

This cross-sectional study enrolled 388 male students from 5 Lebanese schools between October and December 2019. A list of the schools available in each Lebanese district was provided by the Ministry of Education and Higher Education. One school was chosen from each district using a simple randomization technique. The districts included Beirut (the capital), Mount Lebanon, North, Beqaa, and South. A list of students was obtained from the designated school, and all male students from grades 9–12 (aged 13–17 years) in each school were asked to participate. Students were allowed to fill out the questionnaires on a voluntary basis, and the survey was administered in classrooms to avoid parental influence. Survey researchers assume that children aged ≥ 10 years are capable of answering survey questions.32,33 Subjects who refused to complete the questionnaire were excluded. Data were stripped from any personal identifying information to protect the students’ privacy. The same methodology was used in a previous study.34

Minimal Sample Size Calculation

According to the G-power software and based on an effect size of f2 = 4%, an α error of 5%, and a power of 80% and taking into consideration 4 factors to be entered in the multivariable analysis, the results showed that a minimal number of 304 was needed.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Lebanese International University and the institutional boards of each school. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all students.

Data Collection and Measures

The self-administered questionnaire in Arabic was distributed in paper form. Before use, the questionnaire was translated into Arabic (process involving 2 independent translations, synthesis of the 2 translations, back translations, review of the final version, and pretesting). The questionnaire included 2 sections. The first section collected demographic information, including participants’ age and the Household Crowding Index, which reflects the socioeconomic status of the family. The Household Crowding Index is calculated by dividing the number of persons living in the house by the number of rooms in the house, excluding the bathrooms and kitchen. The second section was dedicated to the assessment of attachment styles and violent video games.

Relationship Questionnaire

This self-assessment measure of attachment behavior18 consists of 4 short paragraphs, each describing 1 of 4 adult attachment styles. Style A corresponds to the secure attachment, style B to the preoccupied attachment, style C to the fearful attachment, and style D to the dismissing attachment. Each paragraph is rated on a 7-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree), with higher scores indicating higher attachment style (Cronbach α = 0.86).

Video Gaming

The participants were asked about their 5 most-played games. The Video Game Questionnaire35 assesses game use frequencies, degree of violent content (blood), and degree of violent images on a 7-point scale (1 = participants seldom play video games, with no violent content or images; 7 = participants often play video games with a lot of violent content and images). A Violent Video Game Scale was adapted for this study based on the Video Game Questionnaire. This scale reflects the frequency and intensity of violent video game exposure. The violence exposure score for each of the participants’ 5 favorite games was computed by summing the violent content and graphics ratings and multiplying by the how-often rating. Higher scores indicate higher exposure to violent video games (Cronbach α = 0.939).

Statistical Analysis

SPSS software version 25 was used to conduct data analysis. The normality of the Violent Video Game Scale score was verified via the skewness (0.731) and kurtosis (−0.3) values varying between −1 and +1.36 A bivariate analysis using the Pearson correlation test assessed the relationship between video games and attachment styles, age, and the Household Crowding Index. A stepwise linear regression was conducted, taking the Violent Video Game Scale score as the dependent variable. Independent variables entered in the final model were those that showed a P < .2 in the bivariate analysis for the elimination of confounding factors as much as possible. Significance was defined as P < .05.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age of the participants was 15.83 ± 1.93 years, and the Household Crowding Index of the participants was 1.39 ± 1.59, with 72.1% having a low monthly income. The mean ± SD Violent Video Game Scale score was 41.47 ± 24.16.

Bivariate Analysis

Higher secure attachment style (r = −0.119) and dismissing attachment style (r = −0.145) were significantly associated with lower violent video game playing. Higher fearful attachment style was significantly associated with higher violent video game playing (r = 0.256) (Table 1).

Multivariable Analysis

The results of the linear regression, taking the Violent Video Game Scale score as the dependent variable, showed that higher dismissing attachment style (β = −1.389) was significantly associated with a lower Violent Video Game Scale score. Higher fearful attachment style (β = 2.981) was significantly associated with a higher Violent Video Game Scale score (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated whether different attachment styles are associated with higher use of violent video games. There is scarce literature on the association between different attachment styles and violent video games, as most research has focused on video games in general.

The study findings suggest an association between different attachment styles and engagement in violent video games. The dismissing attachment style was associated with lower violent video game use, whereas the fearful attachment style was associated with higher use. Studies37 have shown that dismissive individuals play video games in a manner similar to the way in which they behave in their daily lives, spending more time alone rather than socializing. Hence, further studies should assess whether their engagement in video games (even violent gaming) depends more on the genre or whether the game is an MMO (massive multiplayer online gaming). These individuals could be using MMOs to satisfy their social needs while maintaining a barrier within that socialization, or they could be using video games that are not MMOs to escape socializing altogether in their free time.38

Individuals with a fearful attachment style tend to feel unworthy of support and are distrustful of others, hence they distance themselves. Their high engagement in violent video games would be a way of coping with their emotions, or they may be immersing themselves in a world of their own wherein they escape reality and try to construct their identity through this creative platform.39

Contrary to our findings, a recent study26 in Israel among 1,391 children and adolescents aged 9–15 years reported no differences in violent video game involvement between the 3 attachment patterns (secure, insecure-avoidant, and insecure-anxious). In many current video games, violent acts are not a choice made by players but rather are part of the rules of the game, thus explaining this finding.26 The players need to follow the rules to play effectively and achieve optimal results. However, these games have prosocial aspects such as communication with other players, sharing, and helping, which are more self-directed and autonomous; hence, they allow more of the players’ personalities to be expressed in the game.

Video games have evolved into complex interactive experiences wherein players can freely decide on different courses of action, which can result in completely different gaming experiences.40 Within the same game, players can exhibit violent actions such as killing and eliminating other players, as well as prosocial behavior such as saving the life of other players or displaying cooperation, especially when they play together in teams or groups.41 Hence, the creation of 2 separate variables, one reflecting nonviolent prosocial game content and the other reflecting violent content, is a better strategy to understand the association between attachment styles and exposure to violent video games.

The association between older age and lower use of violent video games trended to significance in the multivariable analysis. Similar results were found in previous research in which people in younger age groups showed the most engagement with violent video games in addition to increased time spent playing the game.42 An explanation for this finding might be that younger individuals are still trying to determine the character traits they want to adopt, and online video games give them a platform to experience different characteristics and emotions.43

Limitations and Strengths

This study had several limitations. There was a lack of focus on sex differences and the relation of sex to aggression, which might play an important role in one’s exposure to violent video games. Moreover, the computed violent video game score did not allow for classification of the participants into low- or high-risk groups and did not reflect the total time spent on violent video gaming. It is also noteworthy that this was a cross-sectional study that did not account for different behaviors over a period of time, but rather the results were collected through self-questionnaire and are thus subject to information bias. One school was selected from each district, which may have produced a selection bias, and the sample size was not big enough to represent the whole country. Also, the scales used in the questionnaire are not validated. Finally, a residual confounding bias is also possible, since not all factors associated with violent video games were taken into consideration in this study. However, this study was able to show an association between different attachment styles and exposure to violent video games, a topic that not only is newly studied in Lebanon, but also is scarcely investigated in the literature, which focuses on video games in general rather than those that are violent.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that individuals who exhibited fearful attachment styles were more likely to engage in violent video games, whereas dismissive individuals were less likely to participate in violent video game use. Further research on stress and empathy in association with these attachment styles should be conducted to investigate whether these factors have an impact on violent gaming exposure. In addition, studies should also focus more on the type of video games and whether they require interaction with others.

Submitted: October 6, 2021; accepted February 8, 2022.
Published online: December 22, 2022.
Relevant financial relationships: None.
Funding/support: None.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank all the individuals who participated in this study.

Clinical Points

  • An association exists between different attachment styles and engagement in violent video games.
  • The dismissing attachment style was associated with lower violent video gaming.
  • The fearful attachment style was associated with higher violent video gaming.
  1. Mitchell A, Savill-Smith C. The Use of Computer and Video Games for Learning. A Review of the Literature. Learning and Skills Development Agency. Regent Arcade House. London, England; 2004.
  2. The many different types of video games & their subgenres. iD Tech. Blog & News. https://www.idtech.com/blog/different-types-of-video-game-genres
  3. Anderson CA, Bushman BJ. Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychol Sci. 2001;12(5):353–359. PubMed CrossRef
  4. Gentile DA. The Rating Systems for Media Products. In: Calvert SL, Wilson BJ. Handbook of Children, Media, and Development. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008:527–551.
  5. Rideout VJ, Foehr UG, Roberts DF. Generation M 2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds. Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation; 2010.
  6. Peracchia S, Curcio G. Exposure to video games: effects on sleep and on post-sleep cognitive abilities: a systematic review of experimental evidences. Sleep Sci. 2018;11(4):302–314. PubMed CrossRef
  7. Panee CD, Ballard ME. High versus low aggressive priming during video‐game training: effects on violent action during game play, hostility, heart rate, and blood pressure. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(12):2458–2474. CrossRef
  8. Barlett CP, Harris RJ, Baldassaro R. Longer you play, the more hostile you feel: examination of first person shooter video games and aggression during video game play. Aggress Behav. 2007;33(6):486–497. PubMed CrossRef
  9. Gentile DA, Swing EL, Lim CG, et al. Video game playing, attention problems, and impulsiveness: evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2012;1(1):62–70. CrossRef
  10. Anderson CA. An update on the effects of playing violent video games. J Adolesc. 2004;27(1):113–122. PubMed CrossRef
  11. Christakis DA, Zimmerman FJ, DiGiuseppe DL, et al. Early television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):708–713. PubMed CrossRef
  12. Swing EL, Gentile DA, Anderson CA, et al. Television and video game exposure and the development of attention problems. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):214–221. PubMed CrossRef
  13. Chan PA, Rabinowitz T. A cross-sectional analysis of video games and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2006;5(1):16. PubMed CrossRef
  14. Sharif I, Wills TA, Sargent JD. Effect of visual media use on school performance: a prospective study. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(1):52–61. PubMed CrossRef
  15. Bushman BJ, Anderson CA. Comfortably numb: desensitizing effects of violent media on helping others. Psychol Sci. 2009;20(3):273–277. PubMed CrossRef
  16. Anderson CA, Sakamoto A, Gentile DA, et al. Longitudinal effects of violent video games on aggression in Japan and the United States. Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):e1067–e1072. PubMed CrossRef
  17. Belsky J, Fearon RM. Infant-mother attachment security, contextual risk, and early development: a moderational analysis. Dev Psychopathol. 2002;14(2):293–310. PubMed CrossRef
  18. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(2):226–244. PubMed CrossRef
  19. Ardenghi S, Rampoldi G, Bani M, et al. Attachment styles as predictors of self-reported empathy in medical students during pre-clinical years. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(5):965–970. PubMed CrossRef
  20. Cooper ML, Shaver PR, Collins NL. Attachment styles, emotion regulation, and adjustment in adolescence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(5):1380–1397. PubMed CrossRef
  21. Tan A, Zimmermann C, Rodin G. Interpersonal processes in palliative care: an attachment perspective on the patient-clinician relationship. Palliat Med. 2005;19(2):143–150. PubMed CrossRef
  22. Anderson CA, Gentile DA, Buckley KE. Violent Video Game Effects on Children and Adolescents: Theory, Research, and Public Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.
  23. Blackwell D, Leaman C, Tramposch R, et al. Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;116:69–72. CrossRef
  24. Assunção RS, Costa P, Tagliabue S, et al. Problematic Facebook use in adolescents: associations with parental attachment and alienation to peers. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(11):2990–2998. CrossRef
  25. Fullwood C, Quinn S, Kaye L, et al. My virtual friend: a qualitative analysis of the attitudes and experiences of smartphone users: implications for smartphone attachment. Comput Human Behav. 2017;75:347–355. CrossRef
  26. Shoshani A, Braverman S, Meirow G. Video games and close relations: attachment and empathy as predictors of children’s and adolescents’ video game social play and socio-emotional functioning. Comput Human Behav. 2021;114:106578. CrossRef
  27. Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD, et al. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(2):178–186. PubMed CrossRef
  28. Goetz C. Securing home base: separation-individuation, attachment theory, and the “virtual worlds” paradigm in video games. Psychoanal Study Child. 2017;70(1):101–116. CrossRef
  29. Anderson CA, Shibuya A, Ihori N, et al. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(2):151–173. PubMed CrossRef
  30. Kühn S, Kugler DT, Schmalen K, et al. Does playing violent video games cause aggression? a longitudinal intervention study. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(8):1220–1234. PubMed CrossRef
  31. Gentile DA, Lynch PJ, Linder JR, et al. The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. J Adolesc. 2004;27(1):5–22. PubMed CrossRef
  32. Scott J. Children as respondents: methods for improving data quality. In: Lyberg L, Biemer P, Collins M, et al. Survey Measurement and Process Quality. John Wiley & Sons; 1997:331–350.
  33. Borgers N, Hox J. Reliability of responses in questionnaire research with children. Presented at the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology. October 3–6, 2000; Cologne, Germany.
  34. Berro J, Akel M, Hallit S, et al. Relationships between inappropriate eating habits and problematic alcohol use, cigarette and waterpipe dependence among male adolescents in Lebanon. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):140. PubMed CrossRef
  35. Anderson CA, Dill KE. Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78(4):772–790. PubMed CrossRef
  36. Hult GTM, Hair JF Jr, Proksch D, et al. Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. J Int Mark. 2018;26(3):1–21. CrossRef
  37. Mazur NE. Attachment Styles and Video Game Preference and Usage. Presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Conference (MPA). May 2015; Chicago, IL.
  38. Limke-McLean A. The cost of war: attachment and MMO gamers’ online and offline relationships. J Relationsh Res. 2018;9:e14. CrossRef
  39. Mikulincer M. Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(2):513–524. PubMed CrossRef
  40. Squire K. Video games and learning: teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Alberta J Educ Res. 2013;59(1):129–132.
  41. Gentile DA, Anderson CA, Yukawa S, et al. The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: international evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009;35(6):752–763. PubMed CrossRef
  42. Griffiths MD, Davies MN, Chappell D. Online computer gaming: a comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. J Adolesc. 2004;27(1):87–96. PubMed CrossRef
  43. Grajewski P, Dragan M. Adverse childhood experiences, dissociation, and anxious attachment style as risk factors of gaming disorder. Addict Behav Rep. 2020;11:100269. PubMed CrossRef